Back to the module/Regulatory intelligence, from a reading list to owned obligations
The point

The regulatory problem is not access to publications; it is that reading all of them to find the thirty-one is nobody's actual job.

Two thousand publications, thirty-one that matter

A year of output from the regulators one mid-size financial group is exposed to.

Regulatory output this year

Sources monitored, everything they published, and how much of it changed an obligation here

Regulators

14

across four jurisdictions

Publications

2,180

consultations, rules, guidance, speeches

Materially relevant

31

changed an obligation or a control

Why it matters

About one and a half per cent mattered. Everything else was correctly published, correctly circulated and correctly ignored — and finding which was which consumed a specialist's year.

How things get missed

Never in the obvious way. A change lands in a jurisdiction the team watches, in a publication type they read, affecting a business line nobody thought to check — and it surfaces eleven months later in an examination, as a question about why nothing was done.

Regulatory intelligence, from a reading list to owned obligations | GeneSecure