Governance, risk & compliance

Replace the GRC patchwork with one governed command center.

Enterprise risk, operational resilience, business continuity, third-party risk and privacy in a single map-once, reuse-everywhere model — a modern alternative to ServiceNow GRC and RSA Archer.

app.gene-secure.ai/dashboard

GRC Command Center

Live

Controls

2,140

Frameworks mapped

11

Open issues

63

-18

Resilience tolerance met

97%

Control test pass rate, last 10 cycles

Trend

GeneSecure Enterprise GRC unifies governance, risk and compliance into one command center spanning the enterprise risk register, operational resilience, business continuity, third-party risk and privacy. A shared control and obligation model lets you map a control once and reuse it across every framework, while skill-agents and a semantic knowledge graph keep the picture connected and current.

0platform replacing the GRC, resilience and privacy stack

Illustrative outcome. We will map Enterprise GRC to your own data, frameworks and targets in a working demo.

Why teams choose it

The case for Enterprise GRC

One command center for risk, resilience, third-party and privacy.

Map once, reuse everywhere

A shared control library means one control satisfies many frameworks — no duplicate evidence, no copy-paste drift.

Resilience built in

Operational resilience and business continuity are first-class, with BIA, RTO/RPO and impact tolerances mapped to CPS 230 and DORA.

Third-party risk on the same fabric

Vendors, their criticality and their controls live in the same graph as your own risks, so concentration and chains are visible.

Privacy without a separate tool

GDPR/CCPA DSAR workflows, ROPA and breach handling sit inside the same platform as risk and compliance.

A credible Archer / ServiceNow alternative

Modern UX, AI agents and a built-in capability matrix and 5-year TCO comparison — without the integration tax.

Connected, not siloed

A semantic knowledge graph links risks, controls, obligations, assets and vendors so nothing lives in isolation.

Inside the module

Capabilities that ship on day one

Every capability runs on the shared data fabric, the governed Cortex brain and the evidence ledger — so Enterprise GRC compounds with the rest of the platform.

Enterprise risk register

Heat maps, appetite, KRIs and treatment workflow for the whole enterprise.

Operational resilience

Important business services, impact tolerances and scenario testing for CPS 230 and DORA.

Business continuity

Business impact analysis, RTO/RPO, recovery plans and exercise scheduling.

Third-party / vendor risk

Vendor inventory, tiering, assessments and continuous monitoring.

app.gene-secure.ai/dashboard

GRC Command Center

Live

Controls

2,140

Frameworks mapped

11

Open issues

63

-18

Resilience tolerance met

97%

Control test pass rate, last 10 cycles

Trend

Privacy management

DSAR intake and fulfilment, records of processing, consent and breach notification.

Compliance assurance

Control testing, issue management and a unified evidence locker across frameworks.

GRC knowledge graph

Semantic graph connecting risks, controls, obligations, assets and vendors.

50 skill-agents

Agents that draft assessments, summarise control gaps and assemble committee packs.

Interactive walkthrough

Enterprise GRC, from a reconciliation problem to one governed register

Five scenes: what the patchwork costs, one register seen through five lenses, inherent to residual control by control, who has actually tested what, and what governance receives.

Platform walkthroughs for this module

In practice

Real scenarios, real outcomes

Where Enterprise GRC changes the day-to-day — the situation teams start from, and the outcome they get.

Retire the GRC patchwork

The challenge

Enterprise risk, resilience, third-party and privacy each live in a different tool, with the same controls documented and drifting in three places.

The outcome

One command center replaces the stack; a control mapped once satisfies every framework it touches, with no duplicate evidence.

Prove CPS 230 / DORA resilience on demand

The challenge

The regulator asks whether important business services stay within impact tolerance during disruption — and the answer lives across disconnected documents.

The outcome

Mapped services, impact tolerances and exercise evidence answer in a single export, not a month-long reconstruction.

Committee pack without the scramble

The challenge

Assembling the board risk-committee pack means emailing owners for status and pasting it into slides the night before.

The outcome

Skill-agents draft the pack from live risk, control and issue data, so the committee reviews current facts instead of stale snapshots.

Built for the people who own the risk

Made for your team, aligned to your frameworks.

Cortex skill-agents draft the work, cite their sources and write every action to the evidence ledger — so Enterprise GRC accelerates the people accountable for it without putting your audit posture at risk.

Who it serves

  • Chief Risk Officers
  • Heads of Compliance
  • Operational resilience officers
  • Privacy officers
  • Board risk committees

Aligned to

  • APRA CPS 230
  • DORA
  • NIS2
  • SOC 2
  • ISO 27001
  • GDPR
  • CCPA
CortexAI reasoning copilot
Grounded

Shared device fingerprint with the ring94
Repair shop tied to a prior SIU case87
Loss pattern matches the closed cluster81
SourcesPolicy ledgerClaims graphSIU casebook
Confidence94%
FAQ

Enterprise GRC FAQ

What evaluation teams want to know before a demo — answered plainly.

Instead of re-documenting the same control for SOC 2, ISO 27001 and CPS 230 separately, you define it once and map it to every framework it satisfies. Test once, and the evidence flows to all of them.

Yes. It covers enterprise risk, resilience, continuity, third-party and privacy in one place, ships AI agents and a knowledge graph, and includes a side-by-side capability matrix and 5-year TCO comparison to help you make the case.

Important business services are mapped to their supporting processes, vendors and assets with impact tolerances; scenario tests and continuity plans then prove you can stay within tolerance during disruption.

Yes — GDPR/CCPA DSAR intake and fulfilment, records of processing activities, consent tracking and breach notification are native, sharing the same data fabric as risk and compliance.

Agents operate under policy-as-code from Cortex — allowed actions, model choice and content filters are enforced, and every action is logged to a tamper-evident audit trail.

See Enterprise GRC on your data

Book a working session and we will map your sources, workflows and frameworks onto Enterprise GRC — and show Cortex reasoning over them live.

Enterprise GRC — One command center for risk, resilience, third-party and privacy. | GeneSecure